Soros-Funded DA Bragg GIVES UP Demanding Trump Sentencing by Corrupt Judge Merchan? Viva Frei Vlawg
Updated: November 20, 2024
Summary
The video delves into the intricacies of the New York persecution led by Alvin Bragg against Trump, focusing on the hush money payment case involving Stormy Daniels. It highlights the significant Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity and its potential impact on Trump's conviction, with discussions on defense strategies and pending appellate review. The speaker predicts a vacated conviction for Trump based on the Supreme Court ruling, and expresses concern over the country's future while urging viewer action.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction to Mobile Home Office Benefits
Update on New York Alvin Bragg Corruption Case
Background on Trump's Charges
Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity
Request for Sentencing Adjournment
Response from Alvin Bragg's Office
Insistence on Sentencing Postponement
Prediction on Sentencing Outcome
Final Remarks and Call to Action
Introduction to Mobile Home Office Benefits
The speaker discusses the benefits of having a mobile home office, such as easily adjusting light and air by opening the hood of the office.
Update on New York Alvin Bragg Corruption Case
The speaker mentions the distraction caused by the DNC convention but provides an update on the New York persecution conducted by Alvin Bragg before a corrupt judge, Juan Marsha.
Background on Trump's Charges
Explanation of the hush money payment case where Trump was charged with felony charges related to mischaracterizing payments to Stormy Daniels, leading to a felony conviction.
Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity
Discussion of a significant Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity for official acts and its impact on Trump's case in New York, leading to a postponement of the sentencing.
Request for Sentencing Adjournment
Details about the letters exchanged between Trump's camp and Alvin Bragg regarding the request for adjournment of sentencing, anticipating a vacated conviction based on the Supreme Court ruling.
Response from Alvin Bragg's Office
Alvin Bragg's office response to the request for adjournment, deferring to the court's judgment while downplaying the importance of the evidence in question.
Insistence on Sentencing Postponement
Discussion on the defense's intent to seek appellate review before sentencing and the attempt to reduce the impact of the Supreme Court ruling on evidence admissibility.
Prediction on Sentencing Outcome
The speaker predicts that the conviction will be vacated due to the Supreme Court ruling on immunity and criticizes the tactics used by the prosecutors in Trump's case.
Final Remarks and Call to Action
The speaker emphasizes the importance of predictions and the upcoming fight, expressing concern over the country's future and urging action from the audience.
FAQ
Q: What is the update on the New York persecution mentioned in the file?
A: The update mentions that Alvin Bragg is conducting the New York persecution before a corrupt judge named Juan Marsha.
Q: What is the hush money payment case mentioned in the file involving Trump?
A: The hush money payment case involves Trump being charged with felony charges related to mischaracterizing payments to Stormy Daniels, ultimately leading to a felony conviction.
Q: What significant Supreme Court ruling is discussed in relation to presidential immunity for official acts?
A: The file discusses a significant Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity for official acts and its impact on Trump's case in New York, leading to a postponement of the sentencing.
Q: What letters were exchanged between Trump's camp and Alvin Bragg regarding the request for adjournment of sentencing?
A: The details mention the exchange of letters between Trump's camp and Alvin Bragg regarding the request for adjournment of sentencing, anticipating a vacated conviction based on the Supreme Court ruling.
Q: What does Alvin Bragg's office response to the request for adjournment indicate?
A: Alvin Bragg's office response defers to the court's judgment while downplaying the importance of the evidence in question.
Q: What is the defense's intent mentioned in the file regarding the Supreme Court ruling on evidence admissibility?
A: The file discusses the defense's intent to seek appellate review before sentencing and attempts to reduce the impact of the Supreme Court ruling on evidence admissibility.
Q: Why does the speaker predict that the conviction will be vacated?
A: The prediction is based on the Supreme Court ruling on immunity, leading the speaker to believe that the conviction will be vacated.
Q: What tactics used by the prosecutors in Trump's case does the speaker criticize?
A: The speaker criticizes the tactics used by the prosecutors in Trump's case.
Q: Why does the speaker emphasize the importance of predictions and the upcoming fight in the file?
A: The speaker emphasizes the importance of predictions and the upcoming fight, expressing concern over the country's future and urging action from the audience.
Get your own AI Agent Today
Thousands of businesses worldwide are using Chaindesk Generative
AI platform.
Don't get left behind - start building your
own custom AI chatbot now!